Oedipus Fate Essay - 843 Words

Oedipus the King is a story about a prominent king torn by fate and the effect his own actions have upon his destiny. Much can be learned from the catastrophic story of Oedipus, who was prophesied to kill his father, to marry and have children with his own mother. As soon as Oedipus learns of this prophecy, he tries desperately to escape it, by running from his hometown, and even avoiding his supposed parents. Despite the fact that fate may have played some role in Oedipus demise, it ultimately was brought about by his own free will and his reckless actions. Although he may not realize it, Oedipus own actions contribute to his downfall; it is his arrogant short temper and his excessive pride that causes him to make the decisions that set†¦show more content†¦Both Oedipus and Jocasta act as though the servant’s story, once spoken, is irrefutable history. Neither can face the possibility of what it would mean if the servant were wrong. This is perhaps why Jocasta feels she can tell Oedipus of the prophecy that her son would kill his father, and Oedipus can tell her about the similar prophecy given him by an oracle (867–875), and neither feels compelled to remark on the coincidence; or why Oedipus can hear the story of Jocasta binding her child’s ankles (780–781) and not think of his own swollen feet. While the information in these speeches is largely intended to make the audience painfully aware of the tragic irony, it also emphasizes just how desperately Oedipus and Jocasta do not want to speak the obvious truth: they look at the circumstances and details of everyday life and pretend not to see them. However, Sophocles imbues these opening scenes with even more dramatic irony. Oedipus takes the problem quite personally, as he vows, Whoer it was that slew/Laius, the same wild hand may seek me ... too:/And caring thus for Laius, is but care/For mine own blooda (12). The irony here is obvious: Oedipus has pledged to seek out whoever it was that killed Laius, with the same vigor that he would if it were a member of his family that he was avenging. Firstly, Oedipus has ultimately promised to destroy himself, since it was heShow MoreRelatedOedipus Fate And Fate Essay777 Words   |  4 PagesFate as defined by the Merriam Webster dictionary is ‘an inevitable and often adverse outcome, condition, or end’. Sophocles discusses fate vs free will in his plays. In the play Oedipus Rex there was a prophecy that Oedipus was destined to kill his father and marry his mother, he attempts to escape his destiny by running away to Thebes where he meets his fate. In the play Antigone, th at main character Antigone decides to go against Creon’s (her uncle who has inherited the throne) decree and buryRead MoreOedipus Fate Essay1478 Words   |  6 Pagesresponsible for their actions or is it fate? Is fate inescapable? A persons fate is the events that are destined to happen to them. Fate is decided the moment someone is born. People cannot change their fate and it is unavoidable. Throughout the Greek tragedy, Oedipus the King, the hero, Oedipus often tries to run away from what he is destined to do only because of his ignorance to his situation. Throughout the entire play, the conflict of Man versus Fate is often seen as everyone tries to avoidRead MoreOedipus Fate Essay956 Words   |  4 Pagestragedy, Oedipus the King, fate is a predetermined course of events and is also an important factor that caused Oedipus’s downfall. Oedipus is ultimately a victim of his own fate because, despite his and Jocasta’s efforts, he could not escape the propheci es. Though others say that Oedipus created his own fate because he had the free will to handle the prophecies in becoming his own outcome, in the end, there was no chance that Oedipus could escape the prophecies. It was the fate for Oedipus gettingRead MoreOedipus Fate Essay840 Words   |  4 PagesIn Oedipus the king the Prophets tells Oedipus how his life will pan out and that there is nothing that he can do about it. Oedipus, however thinks he can prove them wrong being the self righteous person that he is. He believes that fate is not real and that its all about free will and individual decisions that lead to and determine the future. Oedipus is wrong for thinking that he can change his fate because the world is controlled by fate not free will. â€Å"Do you know who your parents are? UnknowingRead MoreComparing the Fate of Oedipus and Phaedra Essay2321 Words   |  10 Pages   Ã‚  Ã‚   Oedipus destruction was foretold to his father and mother, Laius and Jocasta, when he was born. It was told to him again when he was a young Corinthian prince, to which he ran from home (I heard all that and ran 876). Tiresias tells it to him again during the passage of the Oedipus Rex. The destiny of Oedipus has been laid down, unalterable from the moment he was created. He was fated to marry his mother and kill his father. Phaedra is not controlled by fate. She is possessed by a frivolousRead MoreIs Oedipus a Victim of Fate? Essay962 Words   |  4 PagesFate the un-avoidable Throughout the vast history of literature, various concepts have come and gone. The idea of fate or fatalism has been a concept that has survived the test of time. Numerous characters have succumbed to the power of fate and the character of Oedipus from Sophocles’ Oedipus the King is a prime example of the vast power of fate within literature. Sophocles effectively depicts the wrath of fate as he portrays how Oedipus fell victim to fate and his efforts to disregard fate wereRead MoreOedipus Victim Of Fate Essay876 Words   |  4 PagesIs Oedipus a victim of fate or does he possess free will? Explain your reasoning. Do you think free will is a reality or an allusion? I find Oedipus to be a victim of fate rather than having free will. â€Å"()†. Free will could be seen to be more of an illusion than a reality. People and society like to make you think you have control over your own life while in you really do not. While it seems he could have tried harder maybe vowing to never sleep with a women or to never kill a man but is whatRead MoreFate in Oedipus the King Essay1065 Words   |  5 Pagesat least in â€Å"Oedipus the King† in which the protagonist, Oedipus calls forth his doom unwillingly. Fate is defined as something that unavoidably befalls a person. The author of â€Å"Oedipus the King,† Sophocles, writes a tragic fate that Oedipus was born to experience. Fate is what is meant to happen and cannot be avoided or unchanged. Furthermore, events that lead to other events could be the result for one to meet their fate. In â€Å"Oedipus the King,† Sophocles expresses the nature of fate to be determinedRead MoreOedip us: Destiny and Fate Essay1333 Words   |  6 Pagesis by fate. Those who believed it is by choice follow the directions and guidance of their elders. For example, they will try to hold on to the values that their parents instilled in them and use them to guide their entire lives. Others who believed that destiny is by fate, believe that the outcome of their lives is determined by luck, and that no matter what they do or how careful they are, whatever has to happen to them must happen. These proponents that emphasize that destiny is by fate may haveRead MoreParallels of Fate in Crash and Oedipus the King Essay1046 Words   |  5 Pages Fate to most people is something that will inevitably happen in their lives, something that they are destined to have or to be. According to Dictionary.com, fate is defined as something that unavoidably befalls a person, but to others, fate is merely coincidence. The debate whether fate is apart of our everyday lives have been going on since the ancient greeks to today. The movie Crash parallels to the play, Oedipus the King, in that both of the characters experience some form of fate in their lives

Oedipus By William Shakespeare s Oedipus - 1096 Words

1. (Question 1) The situation in Thebes is that they have a plague. Oedipus wants to discover the murderer of Laius in order to end the suffering of his people. 2. (Question 2) Oedipus is a man of action, but he is also a man of temper. Oedipus bullies Tiresias into answering him. It is at this point that Tiresias reveals that Oedipus has killed the previous king, Laius. A pattern emerges regarding Oedipus behavior. He has a temper, but is also used to having his way. At one point Oedipus becomes extremely angry and accuses Tiresias of acting in collusion with his brother-in-law, Creon, to take the throne from Oedipus. 3. (Question 3) Oedipus doesn’t accept the story because he has already accused Tiresias of being personally disloyal, stubborn, unpatriotic, and disrespectful to Thebes and that he is partly responsible for the death of Laius. Tiresias has several times accused Oedipus of having an uncontrollable temper. This temper may help explain why Oedipus rejects Tiresias’s revelations about Oedipus himself. 4. (Question 6) Oedipus begins to think that he is the murderer when he learns the location of the crime scene. Tiresias tells Oedipus that he is the murderer, the cause of all the suffering in Thebes. Tiresias half-explains that Oedipus has done more evil than he can even imagine. Jocasta then tells him a story to show that the gods will reveal what prophets and seers sometimes do not. She believes the oracle that prophesied her husband s death at theShow MoreRelatedWilliam Shakespeare s Oedipus 1977 Words   |  8 PagesImmediately Oedipus boldly launches a campaign to do what is best for his people and for himself†¦ I also, as is meet, will lend my aid To avenge this wrong to Thebes and to the god. Not for some far-off kinsman, but myself, Shall I expel this poison in the blood; For whoso slew that king might have a mind To strike me too with his assassin hand. A touch of selfishness is revealed in the above passage, a not-unexpected accompaniment of â€Å"godlike mastery.† Oedipus, in his public proclamation regardingRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Oedipus And Othello 982 Words   |  4 PagesOedipus and Othello are two of the most known tragic heroes throughout all of literature. While there are some noticeable differences between the two there are also many similarities between the two characters. With the amount of similarities between the two plays Shakespeare must have been inspired by Oedipus and Sophocles when he was writing Othello. Oedipus the king’s main conflict is based around Greek mythology in that from the time Oedipus is born it is prophesied by the Gods that he is goingRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Oedipus Tyrannus 1531 Words   |  7 PagesOedipus Tyrannus is a play written by Sophocles, and it deals with the interactions between divine justice/fate and human control in the events that take place for Oedipus. He is the son of King Laius and Queen Jocasta but he was given away as an infant due to news of a horrid oracle that would destroy the kingdom and his parents. Apollo’s oracle shows that Oedipus’s destiny and life as a whole was already predetermined before he was born and that Oedipus has no choice that would affect those eventsRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Oedipus The King 909 Words   |  4 PagesEnglish Assignment – Oedipus The King In the story, Oedipus The King, written by Sophocles, two important aspects of Oedipus’ character that lead to his demise are his determination to find the truth of his origin, as well as his anger. These are flaws that negatively affect the tragic outcome at the end of the plot. Oedipus first shows signs of anger when he does not want to hear what Tiresias has to say about the murderer of Laius, even after the ruler begs for the truth. Oedipus yells, Enough! IRead MoreExploration Of William Shakespeare s Oedipus The King 1810 Words   |  8 Pages Exploration of Intellect in Oedipus the King Joshua Small English Composition II Section 201 Professor Kerwan 24 October 2015 Joshua Small Professor Kerwan English Composition II 24 October 2015 Exploration of Intellect in â€Å"Oedipus the King† Oedipus the King by Sophocles has been examined countless times over the years. It is not merely a story about a tragic prophecy fulfilled, or about a son murdering his father then marrying his mother. Oedipus the King has been analyzed manyRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Oedipus, A Play Written By Sophocles1553 Words   |  7 Pagesconvey dramatic irony through diction that symbolizes something to the audience. Oedipus, a play written by Sophocles, contains numerous accounts where the author uses words to convey a deeper truth about characters and their experiences. Sight, light, blindness, and darkness all have a literal meaning, but when placed into this play, with its intricate plot, they express the dramatic ironies that unfold between Oedipus and his past. Greek tragedies are known to use language that expresses the deeperRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Sophocles Oedipus998 Words   |  4 PagesShakespeare, one of the greatest playwrights of the Renaissance era, could have changed Ancient Greek Theatre plays tremendously as his approach was drastically different than that of Greek playwrights. In Oedipus by Sophocles, a curse has been set on the people of Thebes for the previous murderer of their former king Laius. King Oedipus as a child was given a prophecy that he would kill his father and marry his mother and that indeed has occurred as it is proven by witnesses that he was the murdererRead MoreThe Oedipus Complex ( Oedipus )1666 Words   |  7 Pageswith the Oedipus complex, which is when a boy has an attachment to the mother, which in turns results in aggressive and envious feelings toward the father and these feelings are largely repressed. The Oedipus complex comes from Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus but has largely been associ ated with Hamlet as well, since he and his mother Gertrude, have an extremely complicated relationship (Oedipus Complex). Hamlet is the predecessor of modern psychological thought because Freud came after Shakespeare. In theRead MoreLiterary Analysis Of Hamlet 1366 Words   |  6 PagesLiterary Analysis Psychological State of the Characters in Hamlet The English Play writer, William Shakespeare had written many well-known pieces of work including Hamlet. Hamlet is known to be one of his most popular works. Hamlet was written in the late 16th Century about the Prince of Denmark. The original title of the work was The Tragedy of Hamlet, now it is referred to as just Hamlet. In Hamlet, William Shakespeare uses the mental state of his characters to prove that not all characters in books haveRead More Hamlets Oedipus Complex Essays1190 Words   |  5 Pageswho embody the elements of the classic Oedipus Complex, that of a son with an undue and unhealthy attachment to his mother. D.H Lawrenceamp;#8217;s Sons and Lovers, along with other early modernist works, shows how a sonamp;#8217;s bond to his mother can lead to that characteramp;#8217;s major downfall. Even earlier than works of the late 19th Century does the Oedipus Complex appear, in this case, William Shakespeareamp;#8217;s Hamlet. Shakespeareamp;#8217;s play about the Prince o f Denmark shows

Peer Reviewed Article free essay sample

Locate a peer-reviewed journal article related to literacy evaluation/intervention and write a research summary on the article. The article should be no more than 5 years old. Please follow the format located on the following page of this assignment. OBJECTIVES: This assignment will serve as an introduction to scholarly journal articles. As a Speech-Language Pathologist it is imperative that you use the latest research to design effective methods to treat your clients. After this assignment you should: 1) Gain experience in searching for scholarly articles using internet resources and database materials. Gain exposure to peer-reviewed journal articles and how they are written. 3) Be able to extract important details and information from a scholarly article. 4) Be able to adequately analyze and critique an article. I. Purpose of Study (Specific reason for study) Why is this study being done What is the â€Å"Statement? † The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an experimentally derived reading intervention, delivered by peers, on the oral reading fluency of a first-grade student. II. Rationale for the Study (Theory behind the study) A. What led the author(s) to pursue the study? The authors think that oral reading fluency is a critical prerequisite to independent comprehension of text. Unfortunately, oral reading fluency is frequently neglected by classroom who may feel pressed to spend more time working on comprehension tasks and not devote sufficient time to practicing oral reading of connected texts. The authors think peer-mediated interventions (i. e. , the use of other students as change agents) may be an efficient method to have students practice tasks to improve fluency with basic academic skills like oral reading. What is/isn’t presently done (clinically) that led the author(s) to study this topic? Peer-mediated interventions have been shown to improve reading outcomes. Besides reducing the amount of direct instruction required by the teacher, peers are a readily available resource and have frequent contact with each other, making them a potential source of reinforcement. Contact with natural reinforcement contingencies such as pro-social peer interactions through a structured intervention may promote maintenance of intervention effects. C. What â€Å"new† information has become available that the author(s) felt worthy of study? Brief experimental analysis (BEA) has proven to be useful for selecting intervention components on an individualized basis. Reading interventions selected based on BEA results have led to increased oral reading fluency when implemented by experimenters, teachers, parents, and even the students themselves. III. Method A. Who were the subjects? (participants) Were they appropriately chosen for this ? study? Michelle was a 7-year-old first-grade Caucasian girl who had been referred for reading problems. She had no known psychoeducation- al diagnoses and received no intervention or special education services. At the time of referral, Michelle was reading 11 correctly read words (CRW) per minute, compared to the class average of 66 CRW per minute. Three children in the same classroom were selected by the teacher to be peer tutors. All chosen tutors exceeded the classroom average reading performance as well as the first-grade Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DI- BELS) spring benchmark (i. e. , 40 CRW per minute; Good Kaminski, 2002). During the winter DIBELS administration period, tutors read an average of 88 CRW (range, 78 to 107). Assessments (conducted by the experimenter) and reading intervention sessions (conducted by tutors) occurred in the classroom. B. What were the subjects asked to do? Same-grade peers were trained to lead the target student (Michelle) through a structured intervention protocol based on the results of a brief experimental analysis C. How was the study performed? The teacher trained the tutors using explanations, modeling, and practice of the protocol. At the beginning of each week, the teacher prompted Michelle to choose a reading partner. Prior to each intervention session, the experimenter assessed Michelle using four of the six curriculum passages (i. e. , the current weekly intervention passage and three other randomly selected intervention passages to establish concurrent measures across passages for design purposes). The teacher then reminded the students of the contingency for performance improvements, provided the intervention checklist, and directed the students to begin. Instructional steps included listening passage preview, repeated readings, and word supply error correction. After the intervention session, the teacher timed Michelle’s third reading while measuring CRW per minute (with the same procedures used by the experimenter) and graphed her performance. IV. Results A. What were the results of the study? The results reveal that performance increased (including both improved CRW and reduction in errors) following the introduction of peer tutoring across all passages. A clear change in level was correlated with the introduction of the peer- mediated intervention for both CRW per minute (increase in performance) and errors per minute (reduction in performance). Anecdotally, the teacher stated that Michelle was ‘‘like a different child,’’ in that both her reading and peer interactions improved significantly. The teacher observed fewer negative interactions (e. g. , name calling) and more positive social interactions. The teacher also reported that the intervention was easy to supervise, required minimal time, and produced the desired effects. B. Did the author(s) find what they thought they would find? Yes, I think the authors found that peer-delivered reading intervention can in fact improve the oral reading fluency of a child. V. Discussion? A. How does (do) the author(s) explain the results B. Why did they, or did they not, find what they had expected? These results appear to augment the visible effects obtained with the intervention passages. The authors would argue that the results further strengthen the suggestion that measurement of generalized responding should become the standard of academic intervention studies. VI. Clinical Implications A. What are the clinical implications of the study? The generalizability of these results to other students is limited by the fact that they were based on only one student. Some of the positive features of the environment may further limit generalizability of the results. For example, the teacher and peers were highly cooperative. The same results might not be achieved under less optimal circumstances. B. What do the results mean to you clinically? I do agree that peer-delivered reading intervention could be a successful practice implemented in a literacy curriculum. C. How will you practically apply/transfer the results of this study to your clinical work? When working in the field as an SLP in a literacy intervention team, I would use this technique as supplement to aid a child who is struggling with oral reading fluency VII. Limitations of Study (Examples)? A. Number of participants compared to the general population (e. g. small # of participants) B. Changes in language disorder: Could other factors be the reason (time, other teachers, caregivers). VII. Future Research (follow up study)? A. How could future research be done differently on the study? Future investigations could determine whether positive results are obtained with different configurations of interventions. In future studies, a systematic evaluation of generalized responding following academic intervention within an experimental design would be helpful for determining whether students’ responding is coming under the stimulus control of the universe of possible stimulus–response relations that are necessary for them to progress through school curricula THIS SHOULD END WITH A FINAL PARAGRAPH STATING YOUR OPINIONS ON THE ARTICLE. I highly enjoyed this article, as it is a personal belief of mine that peer-to-peer interaction can be a highly effective tool that can be used to scaffold the skills of children who are behind. Additionally I think that oral reading fluency is a skill that is neglected in the literacy curriculum. This is a very important skill that is most certainly used throughout one’s life, yet it is often neglected unless specifically taught later in a speech or oratory specific class. However, I would love to see this study with a larger population. I’m sure the authors did not have access to a great number of sample students, yet I would love to see this study conducted with more test subjects. Furthermore it would be very interesting to see the effects of not only the child who has a deficit in the oral fluency skills, but also the children who are their peer tutors. I think that peer-to-peer tutoring may in fact help both the tutors and the child being tutored. It’d be great to see research to back up this projection.

The most important and knowledgeable people in his Essay Example For Students

The most important and knowledgeable people in his Essay tory are not born with theirtalents or contributions. They, as everyone does, need a person to give them the optionand the encouragement to achieve their fate. In The Crystal Cave, Mary Stewart portraysthe life of Merlin, the main character, as he grows into a reputable individual of the time. Merlin begins his childhood as a boy who not many care for. Through the help of someimportant people, such as Tremorinus, Galapas, and Ambrosius, Merlin develops into aintellectual and knowledgeable individual. Sometimes all it takes to advance in knowledge is a little space. Merlin is alreadya knowledgeable man when he meets Tremorinus, a master engineer, who openlywelcomes Merlin into his workshop. Merlin remarks on how Tremorinus, allows meto learn all I can from him, gives me space in the workshops and material toexperiment with. (181).Merlin is able to learn a myriad of information while inTremorinus presence. This space that Tremorinus gives Merlin is the right tool to entitleMerlin to ad vance intellectually.Some mentors provide the space for knowledge to grow, but others are moreeffective because they set the foundation for the knowledge to develop. The personagewho is the most efficacious and who bestows the true idea of knowledge on Merlin isGalapas. One day Merlin travels through the forest and stumbles on what looks like aninhabited cave. In the cave Merlin meets Galapas for the first time. Galapas teachesMerlin an innumerable amount of information, but he, hardly thought of his time withhim as lessons. (54). The information that Merlin receives is more useful than thesubjects of languages and geometry that he learns from Demetrius, his first tutor. Merlinlearns how to; collect herbs for medicine, study dead animals to learn of their organs,stop bleeding, set broken bones, and cleanse a wound to stop infection. Merlin loves hisvisits with Galapas. Merlin states, Whenever I could, once and sometimes twice in theweek, I rode up the valley to the cave. (53).The sp ark of interest, to obtainknowledge, that Galapas creates develops Merlin into the knowledgeable individual he isknown to be. Many people contribute to the intellectual development of an individual,but others provide the rare opportunities to procure this wisdom. Ambrosius providesMerlin the chance to obtain much knowledge from his teachers and from his ownexperiences. Ambrosius arranges for Belasius, a proficient mathematician andastronomer, to tutor Merlin. Belasius challenges Merlin by giving him difficult problemsto solve. Merlin comments on how he, walked through the problems he set me as if thefield of knowledge were an open meadow with a pathway leading plain across it for all tosee. (135). Merlin excels at the effective challenges Belasius presents him. Thesechallenges are an effective way for Merlin to learn difficult subjects. Belasius alsoinadvertently introduces Merlin into other aspects of different and secret cultures. Oneday Merlin stumbles onto Belasius and others performing a sacrifice for their secret andillegal religion. Merlin should be punished because he observes this ritual, butAmbros ius allows him to do as he chooses so Merlin can find his one true God. Ambrosius also allows Merlin the personal freedom to adventure on his own to achieveknowledge through his own experiences. Merlin has permission to walk around the townand speak to and learn from whoever he likes. One idea he is curious about is how thestanding stones, (182), were lifted into place. Merlin discovers the answer from a blindman who sings songs to the public. Merlin learns information from the songs of the blindman on a variety of subjects including, the men of old who had raised the standingstones. (184). Sometimes the access to knowledge and the gift of personal freedom areall it takes to develop ones true character and Merlins true character is of an intelligenthuman being. .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d , .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d .postImageUrl , .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d , .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d:hover , .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d:visited , .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d:active { border:0!important; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d:active , .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ub113e103ffeff344fe2a601c06ab605d:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Juvenile Offenders EssayMerlin is a remarkable individual who survives the steep climb on the journey oflife. He is able to endure this quest because of the influence of particular people. Theirinfluence help Merlin become a knowledgeable individual who has an everlastingposition in the Arthurian Legend. Merlin has talents and unique characteristics whicheveryone can look upon with respect and admiration.

Compare and contrast the treatment of the play Hamlet by the directors Franco Zeffirelli and Kenneth Branagh Essay Example

Compare and contrast the treatment of the play Hamlet by the directors Franco Zeffirelli and Kenneth Branagh Paper Many events have occurred in this complex play to put the main character, young Hamlet, in the position and frame of mind in which he finds himself at the beginning of the last scene of the play. Only months ago, his father died, seemingly from natural causes leaving everyone grief stricken. Yet within two months, Hamlets mother Gertrude had re-married to Hamlets uncle Claudius! Then the ghost of Hamlets father appears to him and tells him that Claudius murdered him and that he wants Hamlet to avenge his death. Hamlet also has a place in his heart for the beautiful Ophelia in whom he cannot trust. Hamlet cleverly proves Claudius guilt but manages to stab Ophelias father Polonius instead who is hiding behind a tapestry in Gertrudes room. Hamlet is then banished by Claudius to England where he is supposed to be beheaded. Meanwhile Ophelia goes mad with grief and drowns just after her brother Laertes comes home. Claudius receives word that Hamlet is on his way home so he and Laertes (who seeks to avenge the deaths of his father and his sister) plot to kill him upon his return. We will write a custom essay sample on Compare and contrast the treatment of the play Hamlet by the directors Franco Zeffirelli and Kenneth Branagh specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Compare and contrast the treatment of the play Hamlet by the directors Franco Zeffirelli and Kenneth Branagh specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Compare and contrast the treatment of the play Hamlet by the directors Franco Zeffirelli and Kenneth Branagh specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Hamlet gets back to find it is Ophelias funeral and he grieves for her. The plot created by Claudius and Laertes involves a fencing match and a poisoned blade, which is where we find ourselves at the beginning of the scene. Hamlets frame of mind before the fight is also unstable. He is still grieving for his father and is now grieving for Ophelia as well. He is angry with Claudius for his fathers murder and is still upset with his mother over her hasty re-marriage. Combined with the guilt for the grief he has caused Laertes, Hamlet is going mad and has become almost totally unbalanced. With everything that has happened and Hamlet being the sort of studious and contemplative person that he is it is not surprising that hes lost his mind. In Act 3 Scene 1, Hamlet gives his famous To be, or not to be, speech in which he contemplates suicide but says that he is scared of dying: For in that sleep of death what dreams may come, Since then Hamlet mind set has changed and just before the fight scene (Act 5 Scene 2) Hamlet says to Horatio: If it be now, tis not to come; if it be not to come, it will be now; if it be not now, yet it will come the readiness is all. Hamlet is now prepared to meet his fate if in fact death is his fate. This is the mindset he starts the fight in. In class we watched two exceedingly diverse film adaptations of Hamlet interpreted by two different directors. Im going to look at each of these and compare each component of them. Setting: The Zeffirelli movie stays true to Shakespeares 12th century setting. Elsinore is a dark medieval castle made from stone and encapsulates the feeling of the play very well. The Branagh adaptation however is set in the late 18th to early 19th century in a magnificent royal palace. Its very grand and has white marbled walls and a chequered black and white floor like a chessboard. This has a significant symbolism, as chess is a game that uses strategy to eliminate the opposition an almost perfect synopsis of the play. The place in which Hamlet and Laertes fight is also significantly different. In Zeffirelli, they fight in a square, wooden floor, almost like a boxing ring where opponents circle each other looking for an opportunity to strike. In Branagh, they play on a long thin red carpet and they almost chase each other up and down it before carrying the fight on up the staircases. Zeffirellis version is much more effective. You really get the feeling of the two characters sizing each other up and daring each other to make a move. Costume: In Zeffirellis adaptation, the character of Hamlet in particular is very scruffy with ragged brown hair, an unkempt beard and brown shabby clothes he certainly does not look at all like the heir to the throne. This is like chalk and cheese with the Branagh portrayal. In Branaghs version, Hamlet wears a red uniform. He has very short blonde hair in a military cut and is always clean-shaven. The other characters in Branagh also follow this trend the men in uniforms, the woman in luxurious dresses and the colours clean and bright. This is probably due to the occasion. In Zeffirelli however the men are, like Hamlet, in dishevelled clothes and dirty colours. The woman in simple plain dresses with little colour. But admittedly the costumes reflect the century, and the setting, very well. The part of the scene in which the fight takes place is subject to several costume changes. In Zeffirelli, Hamlet and Laertes start off wearing chain mail and then change to much heavier armour during the part in which Claudius tries to get Hamlet to drink the poisoned wine. At the point around where Gertrude drinks the poisoned wine, Hamlet and Laertes take off all their armour and play in only their shirts allowing for the wounds. Their clothes are very suited to the century simple armour made of heavy metal. In Branagh, as they are actually fencing, they wear white fencing jackets and fencing helmets (meshed face protection). But they begin the scene in their normal clothes and change before they start the fight. They take off there fencing jackets at the point before Gertrude drinks the wine and carry on the fight in vests and braces undergarments typical of the century. Speech: The two films use the original Shakespeare script very differently; the Branagh version uses almost every single word Shakespeare wrote but goes very over the top with the interpretation of it. The Zeffirelli version is more understated and cuts out a fair bit of what Shakespeare wrote but keeps the feel of a Shakespeare play much better. Music: Music in these films was used in varied ways. The Zeffirelli film had much more of a play feeling. There was very little if any background music put in. All the sounds were made by the people in the scene, the props (e. g. the clanking of the swords and the armour) or by the trumpets doing the fanfare. The Branagh version was nothing like this and in my opinion lost the feeling of a play and turned it into an epic movie feature not Im sure how Shakespeare imagined it. Right the way through the scene there is magnificent pieces of orchestral music, softer in the moments where a speech is being delivered and building for the more dramatic bits making the scene very overdone indeed and loosing its integrity. Props: Zeffirelli although normally keeping the play like feel, differed slightly from the script and instead of using foils (thin blades used in fencing), used heavier swords more suited to the 12th century setting. Branaghs 18th-19th century setting however called for the foils and they were much more suitable. But the heavy clashing together of the swords in Zeffirellis adaptation, was much more dramatic and some how more fitting to the events enfolding in the scene. The pearl and the goblet are also props in the scene but are not really seen. The goblets suited their setting and a pearl is after all a pearl. Acting: The acting styles of the two actors playing the part of Hamlet (Mel Gibson and Kenneth Branagh) are very different. Gibson does much better at getting the moody, contemplative and quintessentially mad sides of Hamlets character across and I feel is more like the Hamlet you read on the page. Branaghs Hamlet is very stiff upper lip and military. He also over accentuates the role. He is not the Hamlet written in Shakespeares script but he does convey the side of Hamlet we forget the fact that he is the son of a king brought up to face war. Branagh heavily portrays this side of him. Claudius (played by Alan Bates in the Zeffirelli movie and by Derek Jacobi in the Branagh movie), is much the same as Hamlets character in the Branagh, very stiff upper lip. Zeffirellis Claudius is much more frivolous and a bit of a wastrel less like a king and more like a stupid young man with too much power. Gertrude (played by Glen Close in the Zeffirelli movie and by Julie Christie in the Branagh movie), is at two ends of a long scale in the different movies. This time it is Zeffirelli who makes this character out to be much more than she is in the play and Glen Close plays up the role to a cringe worthy degree. Gertrudes part in this movie is very over dramatised and her death is painful to watch lots of gasping and making a spectacle of herself. This is totally different in the Branagh movie as Gertrude is very understated and in the end scene her death is hardly noticed. Laertes (played by Nathaniel Parker in the Zeffirelli movie and by Michael Maloney in the Branagh movie) is also, like Gertrude, played exceedingly differently in each movie. He acts much more like the wounded son and brother and the spurned friend in the Branagh version but seems to be very conceited and proud. He acts much friendlier toward Hamlet in the Zeffirelli movie and the feeling conveyed is that he really doesnt want to kill Hamlet. The Laertes portrayed in the Branagh film seems to really want revenge. In my opinion at this time in the play, Laertes is a mixture between these two versions of him. Death Scenes Claudius: Claudius death was always going to be dramatic its the culmination of the play Hamlet finally avenging his fathers death. But in the Branagh version dramatic is understated. When Branagh realises his mother is dead (hes currently fighting Laertes on the balcony/staircase) and who is to blame (Claudius) He jumps off the balcony and swings across the hall on the chandelier, jumps onto Claudius and stabs him! Then while Claudius is still pinned to the chair by the chandelier, Hamlet savagely forces Claudius to drink the poisoned wine that killed Gertrude. The way this is done in the Branagh film is so over the top its ridiculous you cannot even begin to take it seriously. The Zeffirelli version is still aggressive but to the right tone. The way its done means that you can understand the feelings being portrayed and how that now Hamlets work is done he can die peacefully. Gertrude: This time the Branagh movie is the one who understates the death of one of its main characters. Something it certainly doesnt do often. When Gertrude falls, the cameras attention is focused almost totally on the fight and you hardly even register that she has died. Zeffirelli makes so much out of her death that you cant stand to watch it. After a few seconds your totally sick of watching Glen Close gasp and retch. Another difference is that Hamlet isnt off fighting somewhere high on a balcony he is right next to her as she dies. Laertes: Laertes isnt a very main character in the play but is quite important in this final scene. His death isnt wonderfully memorable in either movie. In Zeffirelli, he is much friendlier toward Hamlet and his death is less aggressive. When he dies the courtiers surround him. In Branagh he is alone lying stretched out on the white marble floor but still uses his aggressive tones and has the same haughty attitude hes carried throughout the scene. Hamlet: In Zeffirelli, Hamlet delivers his final speech partly next to his dead mother and then moving out toward the middle of the fight ring. After his final words The rest is silence. The camera moves up and away from him as if the camera is his spirit going up to heaven. In Branagh he delivers the whole speech on the red carpet (also the place the fight started) and once he dies, his body is carried from the room with his arms falling in the shape of a cross, like a figure of Christ. Cameras: Branaghs camera use is very fussy, in particular around the part of the scene where Hamlet kills Claudius. Zeffirelli is much freer with his shots and you get much more of the feeling that you are watching a play and less of the feeling that this is the latest epic action flick. Fortinbras Scene: In the Zeffirelli movie the scene in which Prince Fortinbras comes to Elsinore is cut completely. This is probably to make a quicker, cleaner ending. But if you like to think deeply about films your left thinking ok what happens to Denmark? The play wraps tings up nicely with a friendly neighbour (Prince |Fortinbras) dropping in on his way to invade Poland and he ends up taking the throne! But in Branagh this is interpreted very wrongly. Branagh has a huge invasion going on. Prince Fortinbras soldiers are killing Hamlets soldiers, stabbing courtiers, smashing windows and generally being pain in the necks! Again Branagh has tried to make this movie into the latest epic action flick instead of a classic Shakespearian play. Very over the top. Conclusion My opinions of each of these films have already, Im sure, been made very obvious through the course of what I have written but Im going to elaborate on the points I made to draw a conclusion from this essay, including which film I think was most successful. The Branagh movie did nothing for me to put it very bluntly. It was over dressed and over done. Branagh, who is very good as an actor, lets himself down as a director. He reads too much into little things and has a habit of using his cameras very fussily. The final scene is the worst of them all and as someone who adores Shakespeare even I find this hard to take seriously. Imagine someone who is not very into Shakespeare they would think this was the funniest thing theyd ever seen but then they probably wouldnt sit through 3 and a half hours worth of film in a language they barely understand. To get anything from this movie you have to be very committed to Shakespeare indeed. This film may have been accurate to a fault when it came to using Shakespeares language, but when it came to doing things the way Shakespeare intended theyre way off the mark. Any of Shakespeares plays that are made into films should still hold the key essence of a play at their very heart. Zeffirelli does this very well. In the Zeffirelli movie you can really get the essence of what Shakespeare is about. Even though a lot of Shakespeares original words were cut out, the film still carried the story beautifully. The film is much shorter and easier to watch. For someone not used to Shakespeare this is a good film to watch and that is essentially what makes a film successful its audience appeal. Overall the two movies are very different and no two people would draw the same conclusions as I. They show superbly how differently the same tale can be interpreted. It gives you a better chance to look at the play through someone elses eyes and not just how you see it and interpret it. For me however I preferred the Zeffirelli movie because it kept that play like feel to it and is more true to the way Shakespeare told this story of revenge and tragedy.

Monologues From Molières Famous Theatrical Comedy

Monologues From Molià ¨re's Famous Theatrical Comedy Tartuffe translates to The Imposter or The Hypocrite. The play was performed for the first time in 1664 and features popular characters like Tartuffe, Elmire, Orgon, and Dorine. Tartuffe is written in twelve-syllable lines called alexandrines. The plot focuses on Orgons family dealing with the pious fraud Tartuffe as he pretends to talk with religious power, fool the family with random antics, and even seduce women in the household. The Characters in Tartuffe While Orgon is the head of the house and husband of Elmire, he is unfortunately blindsided with desire for Tartuffe, who is but a houseguest of Orgon and a hypocritical fraud. Tartuffe meddles with seduction and romantic agendas with members in the home. Orgons wife, Elmire, is one of Tartuffe’s prospects, and she is also the stepmother to Damis and Mariane. Luckily, Dorine is the family housemaid who tries to get to the bottom of Tartuffes fake personality to help the other characters. A Focus on the Housemaid, Dorine Dorine is the sassy, sensible, witty, and wise servant in the household that is the focus of Moliere’s Tartuffe. Her servant status makes her an inferior, but she courageously expresses her opinions to her superiors, who are actually her intellectual inferiors. For young females in search of a classical monologue, Tartuffe’s cheeky and clever Dorine has quite a few worth examining. The beginning and ending lines of eight monologues involving Dorine are listed below, along with a brief explanation of the content of each speech.  These monologues come from  Moliere’s Tartuffe, translated into English verse by Richard Wilbur, an extraordinarily understandable translation of the French comedy. Act I, Scene 1: First Monologue The scene begins with: â€Å"If there is talk against us, I know the source / It’s Daphne and her little husband, of course.† Dorine expresses disdain for how people who behave badly seem to be the first to smear the reputations of others. She speculates that their delight in spreading the word of the transgressions of others springs from their belief that their own guilty deeds are less obvious when those of others are emphasized. The scene has 14 lines. The scene ends with: â€Å"Or that their own black guilt will come to seem / Part of a general shady colour-scheme. Act I, Scene 1: Second Monologue The scene begins with: â€Å"Oh yes, she’s strict, devout, and has no taint / Of worldliness; in short, she seems a saint.† Dorine dismisses the criticisms of her lifestyle by a woman who is no longer young and beautiful. She attributes this woman’s prudish perspective to jealousy of looks and actions that she is no longer privy to. The scene has 20 lines. The scene ends with: â€Å"And cannot bear to see another know / That pleasures time has forced them to forgo.† Act I, Scene 2: First Monologue The scene begins with: â€Å"Yes, but her son is even worse deceived / His folly must be seen to be believed.† Dorine expounds on ruse after ruse that Tartuffe has used to fool the master of the house Orgon. The scene has 32 lines and ends with: â€Å"He said it was a sin to juxtapose / Unholy vanities and holy prose.† Act II, Scene 2: Second Monologue The scene begins with: â€Å"Yes, so he tells us; and Sir, it seems to me / Such pride goes very ill with piety.† Dorine tries to convince Orgon that he should not impose marriage to Tartuffe upon his daughter. The scene has 23 lines and ends with: â€Å"Think, Sir, before you play so risky a role.† Act II, Scene 3: First Monologue The scene begins with: â€Å"No, I ask nothing of you. Clearly, you want / To be Madame Tartuffe, and I feel bound / Not to oppose a wish so very sound.† Dorine sarcastically endorses Tartuffe as a brilliant catch of a bridegroom for Marianne. The scene has 13 lines and ends with: â€Å"His ears are red, he has a pink complexion / And all in all, he’ll suit you to perfection.† Act II, Scene 3: Second Monologue The scene begins with: â€Å"Ah no, a dutiful daughter must obey / Her father, even if he weds her to an ape.† Dorine tortures Marianne with a predictive description of her life as Tartuffe’s wife. The scene has 13 lines and ends with: â€Å"To the drone of bagpipes- two of them, in fact, / And see a puppet show or an animal act.† Act II, Scene 4 The scene begins with: â€Å"We’ll use all manner of means, and all at once. / Your father’s addled; he’s acting like a dunce.† Dorine explains to Mariane and her betrothed ways to delay and ultimately avoid marriage to Tartuffe. The scene has 20 lines and ends with: â€Å"Meanwhile we’ll stir her brother into action / And get Elmire, as well, to join our faction.† Act III, Scene 1 The scene begins with: â€Å"Do calm down and be practical. I had rather / My mistress dealt with him- and with your father.† Dorine convinces Mariane’s brother Damis to abort his plan for exposing Tartuffe and follow hers. The scene has 14 lines and ends with: â€Å"Says that he’s almost finished with his prayers. / Go, now. I’ll catch him when he comes downstairs.† Resources A video of the complete stage play using the Richard Wilbur translation  is available.Read more about Jean Baptiste Poquelin who took the stage name Moliere.

Framework for Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Framework for Ethics - Essay Example From this paper it is clear that  the models in addition will analyze characterized components of the systems and expound how organizations corporate ethics enhances business performance. The models will emphasis on how business ethics programs helps in decision making using organization illustration as an example. The corporate culture has to come out clearly. The research should conclude by showing how organizations can measure ethical behavior and structure to maintain stakeholders trust.   Effective systems should enable them obtain ethical culture, improve performance output, formulate ethical decision- making and upkeep an environment that nurtures ethical behavior.According to the discussion  the improvement of business performances and ethical behaviors requires effective leaders to look for better methods to sustain them. The pressure and measurement demand for social performance has given upswing to accounting, social and ethical auditing and reporting. Corporate lead ers have used the Triple Bottom Line model to evaluate on effective framework to ethical auditing system.  The model emphasizes on environmental, social and financial effects that may affect the corporate in decision- making. Leaders engage their organizations in this model to increase their commitment on social responsibility of the corporate, their sustainability and ethical conduct. The model helps leaders confirm that directives applied and investment support add value to the organization in achieving desired output or outcomes.